Question: Dear Applicant: Thank you for your application. Unfortunately, we are unable to offer you a position in our local government office for the summer. As you know, funding for summer jobs is limited, and it is impossible for us to offer jobs to all those who want them. Consequently, we are forced to reject many highly qualified applicants.
Which of the following can be inferred from the letter?
- The number of applicants for summer jobs in the government office exceeded the number of summer jobs available.
- The applicant who received the letter was considered highly qualified.
- Very little funding was available for summer jobs in the government office.
- The application of the person who received the letter was considered carefully before being rejected.
- Most of those who applied for summer jobs were considered qualified for the available positions.
“Dear Applicant: Thank you for your application.”- is a GMAT critical reasoning topic. This GMAT critical comes with five options and candidates need to choose the one which is correct. GMAT critical reasoning tests the logical and analytical skills of the candidates. To answer the question, a candidate can either find a piece of evidence that would weaken the argument or have logical flaws in the argument. Candidates get 65 minutes to answer 36 MCQ questions in the critical reasoning section of the GMAT.
Answer: A
Explanation: This is a GMAT critical reasoning question. An assumption is an implied hypothesis. So we are looking for something that is implied in the argument. In case it is wrong or maybe disable the argument.
Let us check the options to find the correct answer:
P1: Unfortunately, we are unable to offer you a position in our local government office for the summer.
P2: As you know, funding for summer jobs is limited, and it is impossible for us to offer jobs to all those who want them.
P3: Consequently, we are forced to reject many highly qualified applicants.
The conclusion that can be drawn from the above letter to the Applicant is that the number of applicants who have applied for a summer job in the local government office exceeds the number of available summer jobs. This is exactly what is stated in option A.
Option B states that the Applicant who received the letter was considered highly qualified. This is not necessarily true based on the information provided above. It could be that the Applicant is among the many that are considered highly qualified or the applicant could as well not be considered as highly qualified. what is, however, true from what is stated in the letter is that the Applicant is rejected because the number of jobs available is less than the number of applications received. It could be that the job offer is based on a first come first served basis or it might be based on how highly qualified an applicant is, but such details have not been provided in the letter.
Option C states that very little funding was available for summer jobs in the government office. While this is true, this is not the main conclusion that can be drawn from the argument. Little funding would have had no bearing on the letter if the number of applicants for a summer job is less than the available jobs in the government office. This can therefore not be the main inference or conclusion from the information provided above.
Option D states that the application of the person who received the letter was considered carefully before being rejected. This may not be necessarily true based on the argument. No information is provided about whether the application of the applicant has been considered carefully. Whether his application was considered carefully or not, there was no vacancy for him for a summer position at the government office. Hence D cannot be an inference from the information provided above.
Option E states that most of those who applied for the summer jobs were considered qualified for the available positions. The information above states that many which is less than most. Option E cannot be true based on the information provided.
Suggested GMAT Critical Reasoning sample
- Arnold: I was recently denied a seat on an airline flight GMAT Critical Reasoning
- Whenever a major political scandal erupts before an election and voters blame the scandal GMAT Critical Reasoning
- Women who are married sleep more soundly than women who have never married or lost a partner GMAT Critical Reasoning
- In anticipation of the coming year, Tecumseh Autos, a national auto manufacturer, GMAT Critical Reasoning
- In the mid-1990s the United States Supreme Court rendered GMAT Critical Reasoning
- Maggie will either move into her old bedroom at her parents' house GMAT Critical Reasoning
- The Bears will not attempt a two-point conversion after the upcoming GMAT Critical Reasoning
- The Dear One Baby Carrier is the safest and most comfortable baby GMAT Critical Reasoning
- If 10% or more of a planet's total mass is water GMAT Critical Reasoning
- Though the press release and other official statements of oil companies GMAT Critical Reasoning
- Some statisticians claim that the surest way to increase the overall correctness GMAT Critical Reasoning
- In Patton City, days are categorized as having heavy rainfall GMAT Critical Reasoning
- The rise in free, do-it-yourself instructions on the Internet GMAT Critical Reasoning
- The commissioner has announced that Judge Khalid, GMAT Critical Reasoning
- Studies have shown that a large percentage of car accidents are caused by aggressive driving. GMAT Critical Reasoning
- Jordan: If a business invests the money necessary to implement ecologically sound practices, GMAT Critical Reasoning
- All teas are served hot or iced. Most coffees are served hot or iced and always contain caffeine. GMAT Critical Reasoning
- When an auto insurance policy compensates the owners of stolen or burglarized cars GMAT Critical Reasoning
- Research has shown that impoverished people in this country buy unhealthy snack foods GMAT Critical Reasoning
- A management protocol system that offers a unique method for the administration GMAT Critical Reasoning
Comments