Contrary To The Charges Made By Some Of Its Opponents GMAT Critical Reasoning

Question: Contrary to the charges made by some of its opponents, the provisions of the new deficit-reduction law for indiscriminate cuts in the federal budget are justified. Opponents should remember that the New Deal pulled this country out of great economic troubles even though some of its programs were later found to be unconstitutional.

The author’s method of attacking the charges of certain opponents of the new deficit-reduction law is to

(A) attack the character of the opponents rather than their claim
(B) imply an analogy between the law and some New Deal programs
(C) point out that the opponents’ claims imply a dilemma
(D) show that the opponents’ reasoning leads to an absurd conclusion
(E) show that the New Deal also called for indiscriminate cuts in the federal budget

”Contrary to the charges made by some of its opponents”- is a GMAT critical reasoning topic. This GMAT critical comes with five options and candidates need to choose the one which is correct. GMAT critical reasoning tests the logical and analytical skills of the candidates. To answer the question, a candidate can either find a piece of evidence that would weaken the argument or have logical flaws in the argument. Candidates get 65 minutes to answer 36 MCQ questions in the critical reasoning section of the GMAT.

Answer: (B)
Explanation:
Contrary to what some of its critics have claimed, the new deficit-reduction law's provisions for indiscriminate budget cuts are justified. Some of the New Deal's programmes were later found to be unconstitutional. But still opponents should keep in mind that it helped this nation out of serious economic difficulties.
The question asks which among the following strategies does the author uses to refute the allegations made by some opponents of the new deficit-reduction law.

Option A :
It states that it is to contest the opponents' character rather than their assertion. This option is a wrong answer and is to be eliminated. This is because the statement in it is totally wrong.

Option B:
This states that it is to allude to a comparison between the law and some New Deal initiatives. In order to support their stance against opponents, the author does mention the New Deal Program. Let's proceed with keeping this in mind.

Option C:
This states that it is to draw attention to the dilemma that the opponents' claims imply.
This option is also a wrong answer. This is because no dilemma can be seen.

Option D:
This states that it is to demonstrate how the opponents' logic results in an absurd conclusion.
This option is also not a correct answer. This is because the Author never discusses the reasoning of opponents.

Option E:
This states that it is to demonstrate that the New Deal also called for arbitrary budget cuts.
This option is also a wrong answer. This is because the statement in it was never mentioned in the argument.
From the above explanation, it is clear that the statement in the second option is the best suited answer out of all options. As a result, the second option is the right answer.

Suggested GMAT Critical Reasoning Samples

• Unripe Lychee Fruit Contain a Compound called Hypoglycin GMAT Critical Reasoning
• Tiger Beetles are such Fast Runners that they can Capture Virtually any Nonflying Insect GMAT Critical Reasoning
• In the nation of Pelmenia, 20% of 18-year-olds are left-handed, GMAT Critical Reasoning
• The tobacco industry is still profitable and projections are that it will remain so GMAT Critical Reasoning
• The price the government pays for standard weapons purchased from military contractors GMAT Critical Reasoning
• In a taste test, participants were asked to try two versions of a cola GMAT Critical Reasoning
• The percentage of households with an annual income of more than $40,000 GMAT Critical Reasoning
• The cotton farms of Country Q became so productive that the market could not absorb GMAT Critical Reasoning
• The average hourly wage of television assemblers in Vernland has long been significantly lower GMAT Critical Reasoning
• Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of common salt to preserve animal hides GMAT Critical Reasoning
• Sol Citrus, a small orchard that produces only organic citrus fruit, has faced new competition GMAT Critical Reasoning
• Studies have shown that elderly people who practice a religion are much more likely to die GMAT Critical Reasoning
• Health officials claim that because the foods and beverages mentioned or consumed GMAT Critical Reasoning
• Monthly employee evaluations are an excellent tool for managers GMAT Critical Reasoning
• Engineers are investigating the suitability of Wantastiquet Pass as the site of a new bridge GMAT Critical Reasoning
• According to researchers, students exposed to a wider variety of GMAT question types fared better GMAT Critical Reasoning
• Physician: The Hormone Melatonin Has Shown Promise as a Medication for Sleep Disorders GMAT Critical Reasoning
• In order to reduce the number of items damaged while in transit to customers, GMAT Critical Reasoning
• A major health insurance company in Lagolia pays for special procedures prescribed by physicians GMAT Critical Reasoning
• In the first half of this year, from January to June, about three million videocassette recorders GMAT Critical Reasoning