Considerable Debate Exists in the Self-Perception Literature GMAT Reading Comprehension

Sayantani Barman logo

bySayantani Barman Experta en el extranjero

Reading Passage Question:

Considerable debate exists in the self-perception literature over the impact of positively biased self-perceptions on social and psychological functioning. Positively based self-perceptions are those in which an individual has a more positive opinion of himself than objective indicators warrant. One view suggests that positive perceptual biases are characteristic of normal human thought across a variety of domains and correlate positively with good mental and psychological health. Certain researchers and clinicians have even proposed that by boosting self-concepts, symptoms of depression and levels of aggression may be reduced.

Investigators on the other side of the debate maintain that when most positive self-perceptions are compared to an objective criterion, they appear neither positively biased nor adaptive. In fact, Baumeister, Smart, and Boden suggest that positively biased self-concepts may have a ‘dark side’. They proposed that it is persons with very positive self-views who are prone to be aggressive. As a result, building up individuals' self-perceptions may serve only to increase levels of aggression rather than curb them.

According to Baumeister et al., not all individuals with positive self-perceptions are going to be interpersonally aggressive. Rather, individuals who are extremely positive in their perceptions of themselves and their functioning are proposed to be the most likely to become angry and potentially violent. The mechanism that triggers aggressive behavior by these individuals has been suggested to be negative social feedback that challenges their positive self-views. Such threats to positive self-esteem give rise to anger and hostility.

If negative social information is encountered that challenges established positive self-perceptions, Baumeister et al. propose that individuals must choose to either accept the feedback and lower their self-perceptions or reject the feedback to maintain their positive self-views. The chosen reaction then influences their subsequent affective states and behavioral expressions. By accepting the external appraisals and adjusting self-perceptions downward, dysphoric feelings and social withdrawal may result. Conversely, the rejection of the validity of the unfavorable feedback results in feelings of anger and resentment toward the source of the threat. Dodge and colleagues demonstrated that children who interpret social cues as threatening direct their anger and aggression at the peers who gave the negative evaluations. Anger stemming from the receipt of social criticism is a way to deny the legitimacy of the negative information. By directing hostile reactions toward the source of the negative feedback, the influx of disconfirming information may end. Unless individuals react against the self-esteem threat, they may be compelled to revise their self-concepts negatively, in line with the information provided. By discounting the negative social feedback, individuals can protect themselves from dysphoric feelings and maintain their positively biased self-perceptions, but they may be setting themselves up to become interpersonally aggressive.

Although positively biased self-perceptions may place individuals at risk for negative social feedback and subsequent increases in aggressive behavior, not all positive self-concepts are suggested to be harmful. The relationship between positive self-perceptions and aggression may depend on the degree of perceptual distortion (i.e., moderate vs. extreme distortion). Baumeister (1989) and Baumeister et al. (1996) proposed that an optimal range of moderate bias might exist within which mental health is encouraged. Maladjustment in psychological and social functioning is suggested to occur when the degree of bias of self-perceptions shifts from moderate to extreme levels. Extremely negative and positive perceptual bias would be related to different but equally harmful difficulties.

‘Considerable debate exists in the self-perception literature’’ is a GMAT reading comprehension passage with answers. Candidates need a strong knowledge of English GMAT reading comprehension.

This GMAT Reading Comprehension consists of 7 comprehension questions.

The GMAT Reading Comprehension questions are designed for the purpose of testing candidates’ abilities in understanding, analysing, and applying information or concepts. Candidates can actively prepare with the help of GMAT Reading Comprehension Practice Questions.

Questions and Solutions

  1. The primary purpose of this passage is to
  1. Present two explanations of a phenomenon and reconcile the differences between them
  2. Discuss a plan for investigation of a phenomenon that is not yet fully understood
  3. Challenge the validity of a theory by presenting evidence that the opposite is true in some cases
  4. Summarize two theories and suggest a third theory that overcomes the problems encountered in the first two
  5. Present evidence that resolves a contradiction

Answer: A
Explanation:
A is the incorrect answer. This choice is incorrect for two reasons and through reconciliation. The passage says nothing about a plan. B cannot be chosen. The answer is C. The text questions the validity of the idea that having a positive self-perception is directly tied to having normal human thought. It is being in good mental health by demonstrating how having a very high self-perception can result in violent action.

  1. According to the passage, which of the following is mentioned as a factor in determining whether an individual with positively biased self-perception would actually be likely to perform an act of violence?
  1. The gap between what the individual thinks about himself and how good he really is
  2. The gender of the individual
  3. The anger level of the individual’s peers
  4. The individual’s ability to ignore dysphoric feelings
  5. The validity of the unfavorable feedback

Answer: A
Explanation:
Because the phrase that is quoted from the passage is consistent with option A, it is possible that this is the correct answer. Hold on to it till I can locate an alternative that is superior to this one. Option B is not a component that is relevant to determining the answer to the question. The remaining choices do not constitute acceptable responses.

  1. The passage discusses the likelihood of violence stemming from which of the following types of individuals?
  1. An individual with a moderately positive self-perception who receives negative feedback from his peers
  2. An individual with a highly positive self-perception who receives negative feedback from his peers
  3. An individual with a highly negative self-perception who receives positive feedback from his peers
  4. An individual with a highly negative self-perception who receives negative feedback from his peers
  5. An individual with a dark side who receives negative feedback from his peers

Answer: B
Explanation:
It will have a detrimental impact on an individual's self-perception if other people give them unfavorable feedback. So, even if that individual has an extremely optimistic view of themselves. Because of this, the likelihood of violence breaking out is increased. Only choice B is consistent with our previous considerations. As a result, it is the solution that should be chosen.
 

Suggested GMAT Reading Comprehension Questions

Fees Structure

CategoryState
General15556

In case of any inaccuracy, Notify Us! 

Comments


No Comments To Show