Company A - Company B Video Games AWA GMAT Sample

Company A - Company B Video Games AWA GMAT Sample is an argumentative essay topic. Through an essay, the GMAT analytical writing work evaluates a candidate's writing abilities. The candidate must highlight the errors and questionable assumptions in the argument presented in this GMAT AWA essay. Practice with GMAT AWA practice papers is the most effective way to get prepared for the exam. It is important for difficult and task-oriented candidates to give their answers in an orderly and prepared way. Candidates must ensure efficient idea presentation in the GMAT AWA essay.

If the author of the GMAT AWA essay tells the truth, it will be stronger. Without such, the argument lacks strong supporting evidence and tentacles. Candidates are required to provide arguments and share their opinions. They must present persuasive evidence against the topic. Candidates should also make an effort to persuade the readers by detailing the different facts and figures of the scenario. However, candidates must be aware that the GMAT AWA Essay demands them to follow a specific format in order to write in an ordered manner. The following format, which includes five significant paragraphs, might be considered appropriate for the GMAT AWA Essay.

Introduction: Candidates need to first explain the topic of the essay given, and clearly state how well this is reasoned. The overview of the passage needs to be discussed in the introduction by the candidates.
Paragraph 1: In this paragraph, candidates must put forward the information mentioned in the passage. They can also question the validity of the passage and explain them with reasons. This paragraph should include all the key points that can be discussed in the coming paragraphs.
Paragraph 2: This paragraph needs to include the second reason for the stated opinion of the candidate. Candidates can see the main issue with the argument is that there isn't enough evidence to conclude that Company A will experience a fate similar to Company B. Candidates can also include examples. With the help of the example and argument, it is shown that the point of view is wrong and inconsistent.
Final paragraph: This paragraph should highlight the passage. Candidates can mention the flaws provided by the author and evidence to prove that. They can also mention what would have been different and create a discussion.
Conclusion: The conclusion reminds the reader and students of the title of the article and includes arguments and counter-arguments with examples to support and disprove the candidates' views. Here is a summary of the whole article.

Based on the structure and content of the GMAT release document, the best way is taken to explain the topic by considering the following response strategies, appreciating positive actions, and ignoring negative ones as much as possible:

Instead of analyzing and exploring an argument that criticizes the writer's statement, a characteristic feature is chosen that is maintained throughout the length of the article.
The entire article gives relevance and uniqueness to the readers by providing reasons and illustrations.
Strong declarative or assertive statements are created with active language and statements of cause, reasons, and effect.
The supporting statements are formatted and described well, briefed with two or three sentences, and concluded the article with a strong point

Topic:

The following appeared as part of an article in the business section of a daily newspaper:

"Company A has a large share of the international market in video-game hardware and software. Company B, the pioneer in these products, was once a $12 billion-a-year giant but collapsed when children became bored with its line of products. Thus Company A can also be expected to fail, especially given the fact that its games are now in so many American homes that the demand for them is nearly exhausted."

Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.

Sample Essay:

According to the author. Company A, a significant video game hardware and software manufacturer, expected to fail because its titles are in so many American households and the market is almost at capacity. The author of this essay argues that Company A will suffer a similar fate as a result of Company B's failure. This forecast is supported by parallels between the two businesses. The conclusion is based on the experience of Company B, a former industry titan that finally failed when kids became tired of its product range. There aren't many presumptions the author makes in her argument that need to be supported by more data. According to this line of thinking, the collapse of one company is a reliable indicator of the failure of the other because both firms create video-game hardware and software and hold a sizable portion of the market for these goods. Finally, the author makes the assumption that since Company B failed, Company A will also fail.

The main issue with the argument is that there isn't enough evidence to conclude that Company A will experience a fate similar to Company B. Based on the parallels between the mentioned companies. The assumption that Company A will fail for the same reason as Company B is the first major weakness in this argument. Furthermore, there is no proof to show what fraction of the market Company A owns. First, Company A can genuinely benefit from Company B's experience and develop strategies to preserve its significant market share. Company B didn't fail as a result of its market share or the type of products it produced in general. It failed because kids lost interest in its specific product line. Second, the games created by Company A might contain features like multi-player options that make them more durable than games created by Company B. If a thorough examination of the state of the market had been provided, the argument would have been much more understandable. This argument's second major weakness revolves around the notion that Company B's demise was solely a result of kids growing tired of the company's product line. The claim that this is the only cause is not supported by any evidence. Therefore, the assertion that Company A will also collapse cannot be supported by the simple fact that it accounts for a sizable portion of the video game hardware and software market. Another conceivable distinction is that while Company A holds a sizable portion of the global market, Company B's market share may have been domestic.

Another issue with the reasoning is that the conclusion may be further undermined by pertinent distinctions between Company A and Company B. For instance, Company A's line of goods might be distinct from Company B's in that kids don't get tired of using them. To directly infer from this assumption, one would need to respond to a few crucial questions. Did the games cater to various child age groups? Were the games created by rivals more inventive and sophisticated in terms of technology? Without providing answers to those queries, this section of the broader argument is entirely dependent on assumptions and is not supported by any facts.

The assertion that only the American market will be to blame for Company A's demise is the third and last error in the argument. This is false because Company A has a sizable market share not just in America but also internationally. The author's claim that Company A has a significant market share in the American market and only a little presence in the rest of the world could have been supported by statistics. The author would have to demonstrate that Company A and Company B have enough significant parallels and no meaningful differences to support the conclusion. As a result, the argument is weak for the aforementioned reasons and is not persuasive. It might be greatly improved if the author made sure to include all the pertinent details.

Suggested AWA GMAT Sample

SHARE ON FACEBOOK SHARE ON TWITTER

Company A - Company B Video Games AWA GMAT Sample

Fees Structure

Comments

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWS LETTER