Around 1960, Mathematician Edward Lorenz Found Unexpected Behavior in Apparently Simple Equations Representing Atmospheric Air Flows.

Sayantani Barman logo

bySayantani Barman Experta en el extranjero

Reading passage question

Question: Around 1960, mathematician Edward Lorenz found unexpected behavior in apparently simple equations representing atmospheric air flows. Whenever he ran his model with the same inputs, different outputs resulted - although the model lacked any random elements. Lorenz realized that the tiny rounding errors in his analog computer mushroomed over time, leading to erratic results. His findings marked a seminal moment in the development of chaos theory, which despite its name, has little to do with randomness.

TO understand how unpredictability can arise from deterministic equations, which do not involve chance outcomes, consider the non-chaotic system of two poppy seeds placed in a round bowl. As the seeds roll to the bowl's center, a position known as a point attractor, the distance between the seeds shrinks. If instead, the bowl is flipped over, two seeds placed on top will roll away from each other. Such a system, while still technically chaotic, enlarges initial differences in position.

Chaotic systems, such as a machine mixing bread dough, are characterized by both attraction and repulsion. As the dough is stretched, folded and pressed back together, any poppy seeds sprinkled in are intermixed seemingly at random. But this randomness is illusory. In fact, the poppy seeds are captured by "strange attactors," staggeringly complex pathways whose tangles appear accidental but are in fact determined by the system's fundamental equations.

During the dough-kneading process, two poppy seeds positioned next to each other eventually go their separate ways. Any early divergence or measurement error is repeatedly amplified by the mixing until the position of any seed becomes effectively unpredictable. It is this "sensitive dependence on initial conditions" and not true randomness that generates unpredictability in chaotic systems, of which one example may be the Earth's weather. According to the popular interpretation of the "Butterfly effect", a butterfly flapping its wings caused hurricanes. A better understanding is that the butterfly causes uncertainty about the precise state of the air. This microscopic uncertainty grows until it encompasses even hurricanes. Few meteorologists believe that we will ever ben able to predict rain or shine for a particular day years in the future.

“Around 1960, mathematician Edward Lorenz found unexpected behavior in apparently simple equations representing atmospheric air flows.”- is a GMAT reading comprehension passage with answers. Candidates need a strong knowledge of English GMAT reading comprehension.

This GMAT Reading Comprehension consists of 5 comprehension questions. The GMAT Reading Comprehension questions are designed for the purpose of testing candidates’ abilities in understanding, analyzing, and applying information or concepts. Candidates can actively prepare with the help of GMAT Reading Comprehension Practice Questions.

Solution and Explanation

Question 1
The main purpose of this passage is to

(A) Explain complicated aspects of certain physical systems
(B) trace the historical development of scientific theory
(C) distinguish a mathematical patter from its opposition
(D) describe the spread of a technical model from one field of study to others
(E) contrast possible causes of weather phenomena

Answer: A
Explanation: This option is correct because the first paragraph talks about the simple equations representing atmospheric air flows. It also talks about the development of chaos theory. Later, it explains the aspects of different physical system. So, Option A is correct.

Question 2
In the example discussed in the passage, what is true about poppy seeds in bread dough, once the dough has been thoroughly mixed?

(A) They have been individually stretched and folded over, like miniature versions of the entire dough
(B) They are scattered in random clumps throughout the dough
(C) They are accidentally caught in tangled objects called strange attractors
(D) They are bound to regularly dispersed patterns of point attractors
(E) They are positions dictated by the underlying equations that govern the mixing process

Answer: E
Explanation: This option is correct because the third paragraph talks about how poppy seeds are inter mixed seemingly at random. However, the positions of the seeds are not random. They are actually determined by the system's fundamental equations. Option E is correct.

Question 3
According to the passage, the rounding errors in Lorenz's model

(A) Indicated that the model was programmed in a fundamentally faulty way
(B) were deliberately included to represent tiny fluctuations in atmospheric air currents
(C) were imperceptibly small at first, but tended to grow
(D) were at least partially expected, given the complexity of the actual atmosphere
(E) shrank to insignificant levels during each trial of the model

Answer: C
Explanation: This option is correct because according to the passage, Lorenz soon realized that the tiny rounding errors in his analog computer mushroomed over time. Thus, leading to erratic results. Now, the word "realized" clearly indicates that over the period of time iterating through his experiments. Further, he realized the imperceptible errors are making a difference to the final result. Option C is correct.

Question 4
The passage mentions each of the following as an example of potential example of chaotic or non-chaotic system Except

(A) a dough-mixing machine
(B) atmospheric weather patters
(C) poppy seeds place on top of an upside-down bowl
(D) poppy seeds placed in a right-side up bowl
(E) fluctuating butterfly flight patterns

Answer: E
Explanation: This option is correct because this passage mentions each of the following options as an example. It is a potential example of chaotic or non-chaotic system but Not the Option E. "Butterfly effect", is indeed discussed but not flight patterns. Option E is correct.

Question 5
It can be inferred from the passage that which of the following pairs of items would most likely follow typical pathways within a chaotic system?

(A) two particles ejected in random directions from the same decaying atomic nucleus
(B) two stickers affixed to balloon that expands and contracts over and over again
(C) two avalanches sliding down opposite sides of the same mountain
(D) two baseballs placed into an active tumble dryer
(E) two coins flipped into a large bowl

Answer: D
Explanation: This option is correct because according to the passage, it is this "sensitive dependence on initial conditions." And not true randomness that is the cause that generates unpredictability in chaotic systems, one of the examples may be the Earth's weather. D can follow the typical pathways too. So, Option D is correct.

Suggested GMAT Reading Comprehension Samples

Fees Structure

CategoryState
General15556

In case of any inaccuracy, Notify Us! 

Comments


No Comments To Show