Almost Everyone Knows that the Seeds of the Second World War Were Sown in the First GMAT Reading Comprehension

Reading Passage Question

Almost everyone knows that the seeds of the Second World War were sown in the First. Shared experiences of both wars allow the historians to relate the two in a very direct sense. More than 30 historians have linked both wars because the second war was led by men who had fought in the first and whose sons met combat in the second. The editors of “The Great World War” have tried to put more solid flesh on the idea that the links between the two conflicts are tangible and important. The result is more a compendium than a unified history.

On the issue of leadership in war, there is a greater problem. Comparing Lloyd George with Churchill, or Marshall Foch with General Eisenhower, is not very helpful. The real problem with treating the wars as part of a single great conflict is that the second was not an inevitable or even necessary consequence of the first. The turning point was the decision taken on January 30th, 1933, when Field Marshal Hindenburg, hero of the Great War, called Adolf Hitler, the villain of the next, to be German Chancellor. By chance, the war that had passed and the war in the making were briefly united.

“Almost everyone knows that the seeds of the Second World War were sown in the First.”- is a GMAT reading comprehension passage with answers. Candidates need a strong knowledge of English GMAT reading comprehension.

This GMAT Reading Comprehension consists of 3 comprehension questions. The GMAT Reading Comprehension questions are designed for the purpose of testing candidates’ abilities in understanding, analyzing, and applying information or concepts. Candidates can actively prepare with the help of GMAT Reading Comprehension Practice Questions.

Solution and Explanation

  1. According to the passage which of the following is true?
  1. The deliberate making of some specific circumstances leads to world war two
  2. Historians believe that the sons of the soldiers of the first world war fought in the second world war
  3. The result of both wars is like an integrated past of the two events
  4. Historians’ accounts on the connection between the two wars are biased
  5. Comparing Lloyd George with Churchill, or Marshall Foch with General Eisenhower, is only helpful in the issue of leadership in war

Answer: B
Explanation:
As mentioned in the first paragraph. "More than 30 historians have linked both wars. Because the second war was led by men who had fought in the first and whose sons met combat in the second." So basically these are more than 30 historians but we are concerned with number, or minority or majority.

  1. All of the following can be inferred from the passage EXCEPT
  1. Historians mentioned in the passage were those who faced both the wars
  2. The second world war was not necessarily a consequence of the first.
  3. If Hindenburg had not appointed Adolf Hitler to be German Chancellor, the second world war would not have happened.
  4. The accounts provided by the historians on the connection of the two wars are inaccurate
  5. World war one and two are unwittingly connected

Answer: C
Explanation:
The decision made by Great War hero and Field Marshal Hindenburg on January 30, 1933, marked a turning point. He nominated Adolf Hitler, the next villain, as German Chancellor. World War 2 would not have occurred if Hitler had not been made Germany's chancellor. Because the situation in contrast to this statement has not been discussed in the passage, it is possible but not necessary that it be true. Therefore, (C) is false making it the right option.

  1. The topic of the passage would best be:
  1. The history of world war one and two
  2. Adolf Hitler and world war two
  3. What historians say on world war one and two
  4. The connection between world war one and two
  5. Issues in connecting world war one and two

Answer: D
Explanation:
It is possible to draw conclusions from the passage's historical claims and specifics. The fact that the second war was not an inevitable or even essential result of the first presents. The underlying issue with interpreting the wars as components of a single major battle. In this case, two connected occurrences are being discussed. Therefore, choice D is right.

Suggested GMAT Reading Comprehension Samples

Fees Structure

CategoryState
General15556

In case of any inaccuracy, Notify Us! 

Comments


No Comments To Show