Reading Passage Question
Almost 12 million immigrants were processed through the immigration station on Ellis Island between 1892 and 1954 when the station closed. By 1924, however, the number of immigrants being processed at Ellis Island had been significantly reduced by anti-immigration legislation designed to establish quotas by nationality. This legislation dramatically reduced the number of immigrants allowed to enter the United States.
The Emergency Quota Act, passed in 1921, ended the United States’ open door immigration policy. The law significantly reduced the number of admissions by setting quotas according to nationality. The number of people of each nationality that could be admitted to the United States was limited to 3% of that nationality’s representation in the U.S. census of 1910. The law created havoc for those on Ellis Island and thousands of immigrants were stranded on the island awaiting deportation. The island sometimes became so overcrowded that officials had to admit excess-quota immigrants.
The First Quota Act was replaced with the even more restrictive Immigration Act of 1924. This act further limited admissions of each nationality to the United States to 2% of that nationality’s representation in the 1890 census. The act sought not only to limit admissions to the United States, but also to curtail immigration of southern and eastern Europeans, who by the 1900s comprised over 50% of the immigrant flow. Additionally, the Immigration Act of 1924 allowed prospective immigrants to undergo inspection before they left their homeland, making the trip to Ellis Island unnecessary.
Anti-immigration legislation passed in the 1920s, as well as the Great Depression, kept immigration at an all-time low. For the first time in Ellis Island’s history, deportation far outnumbered admissions. In view of this situation, the Ellis Island Advisory Committee (a committee appointed by the Department of Labor under Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal program) advised that new buildings be erected for detained immigrants to separate them from deportees, who were often criminals. This final surge of construction included the new immigration building, the new ferry house, and the new recreation building and recreation shelters.
“Almost 12 million immigrants were processed through the immigration”- is a GMAT reading comprehension exercise. Candidates need to be highly proficient in GMAT reading comprehension. There are five comprehension questions in this GMAT reading comprehension section. The purpose of the GMAT Reading Comprehension questions is to evaluate candidates' comprehension, analysis, and application skills. Candidates who are actively preparing can benefit from GMAT Reading Comprehension Practice Questions.
Solutions and Explanation
- According to the passage, what was the main reason that immigration numbers fell during the 1920s?
- the enactment of anti-immigration legislation
- the Great Depression
- overcrowding at Ellis Island
- overwhelming disease
- None of these are accurate.
Answer: (E)
Explanation: The third and fourth options are incorrect answers because they were not mentioned as factors for the lower numbers. Each part of the answer can be found in both the first and second options. The answer must include both anti-immigrant legislation and the Great Depression. But since they are not present in one single option, none of the options are accurate. As a result, the final option is the right answer.
- Which best represents the main idea of the passage?
- Quota legislation was designed to control the number of immigrants based on their nationality.
- Due to criminality, a series of quotas were designed and implemented.
- The Emergency Quota was enacted to ostensibly shut the door on the United States’ open door policy until after the Great Depression.
- The enactment of quotas only allowed 1% of one nationality that was currently represented in the United States in at a time.
- The threat of deportation caused widespread panic on Ellis Island during the 1920s.
Answer: (A)
Explanation: The first option is the best suited answer that describes the main idea of the passage. The second option is a wrong answer as it has distorted data. The statement in the third option may be true, but not exactly accurate. The fourth option also has distorted data and so it is invalid. The final option can simply be eliminated as it was not mentioned.
- The tone of the passage would be best described as:
- restrained
- nostalgic
- inflammatory
- informative
- contemptuous
Answer: (D)
Explanation: The fourth option is the right answer. The author's tone is best regarded as informative. This passage presents from a historical perspective, with no interjections of opinion or emotion. Restrained would imply a lack of emotion, which was not found. Nostalgic also implies an emotional reaction to a past that is no longer present. The tone is not inflammatory; there is no anger or disagreement present. Contemptuous is also incorrect because it implies a display of emotion.
- The Immigration Act of 1924 would most likely negatively affect which of the following groups of people?
- the Ellis Island Advisory Committee
- citizens of Greece wishing to emigrate
- citizens of Great Britain wishing to emigrate
- the Lower East Side of New York City
- citizens of Italy and Great Britain wishing to emigrate
Answer: (B)
Explanation: The second option is the right answer. The act would limit immigrants to 2% of their nationality who are currently in the United States. More than half of the immigrants came from southern and eastern Europe; Greece is in Southeast Europe. The act would have little impact on the Ellis Island Advisory Committee. Because British citizens are in Northern Europe, they would have had a better opportunity to immigrate. There is no mention of New York City's Lower East Side.
- What is the purpose of the fourth paragraph?
- to support a theory previously expanded on
- to paraphrase the information already given and reach a general conclusion
- to refute the facts provided
- to pinpoint specific problems with the outcome of previous paragraphs
- to criticize an institution
Answer: (B)
Explanation: The fourth paragraph summarizes the previous three paragraphs and includes some of the information's outcomes, so the second option is the most logical answer. Because there is no evidence of theorizing, the first option is an incorrect answer. No argument or counterpoint is ever addressed, this makes the other options invalid.
Suggested GMAT Reading Comprehension Samples
- Those amused by all the evidence of gullibility should remember the Cardiff Giant GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Modern architecture has been criticized for emphasizing practical and technical issues at the expense of aesthetic concerns GMAT Reading Comprehension
- “Masterpieces are dumb,” wrote Flaubert, “They have a tranquil aspect like the very products of nature, like large animals and mountains GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Present-day philosophers usually envision their discipline as an endeavor GMAT Reading Comprehension
- The years that saw the founding of Cornell and Stanford Universities GMAT Reading Comprehension
- When they first arrived in America as slaves in the 1600s, Africans joined a society GMAT Reading Comprehension
- One of the principal themes of Walzer’s critique of liberal capitalism GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Often it was believed that super intelligence leads to financial success, but a study by Malcolm Gadwall GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Four Legal Approaches May be Followed in Attempting to Channel GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Roger Rosenblatt’s Book Black Fiction, In Attempting to Apply Literary GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Aida Overton Walker (1880–1914), One of The Most Widely Acclaimed GMAT Reading Comprehension
- The latest prominent principle of criminal sentencing is that of "selective incapacitation" GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Correspondences were a Method of Thought and Expression GMAT Reading Comprehension
- During the Past Fifteen Years, Historians of Mexican American, or Chicano GMAT Reading Comprehension
- The ―paradox of tolerance‖ admonishes us that tolerance of the intolerant leads to intolerance GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Initially the Vinaver theory that Malory’s eight romances, once thought to be fundamentally unified GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Perceiving, for all its nicety of functioning in the dark room under strict instructions for accuracy GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Anthropologist Ralph Linton, in categorizing Native American movements GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Surprisingly enough, modern historians have rarely interested themselves GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Art is visible. However, everything one sees is filtered through certain conditions GMAT Reading Comprehension
Comments