A Reliable Survey Indicates That College Graduates Change Employers Four Times GMAT Critical Reasoning

Question:
A reliable survey indicates that college graduates change employers four times on average during the first ten years after college graduation. Therefore, in order to avoid employee turnover, business administrators in charge of hiring new employees should favor job applicants who obtained college degrees at least ten years earlier.

The advice about how to avoid employee turnover rests on which of the following assumptions?

(A) Employee turnover among businesses that hire employees without college degrees is greater than among businesses that hire only employees with college degrees.
(B) Job changes within the same company are less common than job changes from one employer to another.
(C) Employees who graduated from college at least ten years ago change employers less frequently on average than other employees.
(D) Most employees who leave their jobs do so upon either request or demand of their employers rather than by their own initiative.
(E) The survey excluded college graduates who interrupted their vocational careers to pursue advanced academic degrees.

“A reliable survey indicates that college graduates change employers four times” is a topic of GMAT critical reasoning. This GMAT question emerges with five options, out of which the candidates have to choose the correct one. GMAT critical reasoning helps to intensify the argument of the students or weaken the argument so that they could evaluate the correct argument in a logical way. The candidate needs to find proper evidence that would either weaken the argument or would offer logical flaws in the argument. This GMAT critical reasoning helps the student to boost their skill and knowledge. The candidates will get only 65 minutes to answer 36 MCQ questions in the critical reasoning section of the GMAT.

Answer: (C)
Explanation:

We mainly intend to strengthen the depth of that causal relationship among the options. However, in the lesson books and PowerScore Bibles, a detailed explanation of five ways is given to weaken the casual relationship. Find a different cause. Demonstrate that the cause has no effect when it happens. Demonstrate that the effect has no effect when it happens. Demonstrate that the relationship is reversible, or that there is a statistical issue with the data. In order to strengthen a causal relationship, we want to do the exact opposite. That is to rule out a competing cause, demonstrate that the cause occurs when the effect does, and demonstrate that the effect occurs when the cause occurs. Also, eliminate the possibility that the relationship is reversible, or strengthen the data. Therefore, in such a case, our Pre-phrase is searching for an answer option that fulfills one of those five criteria. For example, a reply option that eradicates a potential secondary cause might read: “To avoid employee turnover, the administration needs to focus on the candidates who completed their graduation at least ten years earlier”.

Option (A): Irrelevant
The discussion of this option about employees without possessing any college degrees does not support the causal claim. The argument is totally out of scope.

Option (B): Incorrect
This discussion about changing jobs is totally irrelevant and does not match the discussion.

Option (C): Correct
This option is correct as per the objective that the employees who completed their graduation before ten years do not switch their jobs in a frequent manner.

Option (D): Irrelevant
This argument does not support the causal claim since it depicts the reason for quitting the job that is irrelevant to the current discussion.

Option (E): Incorrect
This option discusses the vocational careers of the employees which stand out of the scope concerning the above topic.

Suggested GMAT Critical Reasoning Samples

Fees Structure

CategoryState
General15556

In case of any inaccuracy, Notify Us! 

Comments


No Comments To Show