
bySayantani Barman Experta en el extranjero
Reading Passage Question
A recent history of the Chicago meat-packing industry and its workers examines how the industry grew from its appearance in the 1830's through the early 1890's. Meat-packers, the author argues, had good wages, working conditions, and prospects for advancement within the packinghouses and did not cooperate with labour agitators since labour relations were so harmonious. Because the history maintains that conditions were above standard for the era, the frequency of labour disputes especially in the mid-1880’s is not accounted for. The work ignores the fact that the 1880's were crucial years in American labour history, and that the packinghouse workers’ efforts were part of the national movement for labour reform.
In fact other historical sources for the late nineteenth century record deteriorating housing and high disease and infant mortality rates in the industrial community, due to low wages and unhealthy working conditions. Additional data from the University of Chicago suggest that the packing houses were dangerous places to work. The government investigation which eventually led to the adoption of the 1906 Meat Inspection Act found the packinghouses unsanitary, while social workers observed that most of the workers were poorly paid and overworked. The history may be too optimistic because most of its data date from the 1880's at the latest, and the information provided from that decade is insufficiently analysed. Conditions actually declined in the 1880’s, and continued to decline after the 1880’s, due to a reorganisation of the packing process and a massive influx of unskilled workers. The deterioration in worker status partly a result of the new availability of unskilled and hence cheap labour, is not discussed. Though a detailed account of work in the packinghouses is attempted, the author fails to distinguish between the wages and conditions for skilled workers and for those unskilled labourers who comprised the majority of the industry’s workers from the 1880’s on. While conditions for the former were arguably tolerable due to the strategic importance of skilled workers in the complicated slaughtering, cutting, and packing process(though worker complaints about the rate and conditions of work were frequent), pay and conditions for the latter were wretched. The author’s misinterpretation of the origins of the feelings the meat-packers had for their industrial neighbourhood may account for the history’s faulty generalisations. The pride and contentment the author remarks upon were, arguably, less the products of the industrial world of the packers ---the giant yards and the intricate plants--- than of the unity and vibrance of the ethnic cultures that formed a viable community on Chicago’s South Side. Indeed, the strength of this community succeeded in generating a social movement that effectively confronted the problems of the industry that provided its livelihood.
‘A recent history of the Chicago meat-packing industry’ is a GMAT reading comprehension passage with answers. Candidates need a strong knowledge of English GMAT reading comprehension.
This GMAT Reading Comprehension consists of 7 comprehension questions.
The GMAT Reading Comprehension questions are designed for the purpose of testing candidates’ abilities in understanding, analyzing, and applying information or concepts. Candidates can actively prepare with the help of GMAT Reading Comprehension Practice Questions.
Solution and Explanation
- The passage is primarily concerned with discussing
(A) how historians ought to explain the origins of the conditions in the Chicago meatpacking industry
(B) why it is difficult to determine the actual nature of the conditions in the Chicago meat-packing industry
(C) why a particular account of the conditions in the Chicago meat-packing industry is inaccurate
(D) what ought to be included in any account of the Chicago meatpackers role in the national labour movement
(E) what data most relevant for an accurate account of the relations between Chicago meat-packers and Meat labour agitators
Answer: C
Explanation: The passage's author asserts that there is an issue with the most recent work. The author also makes the case that things were not going well. As a result, we can infer that the passage's author and the author of the more recent work are in conflict. Option C makes notice of this.
- The author of the passage mentions all of the following as describing negative conditions in the meat-packing industry EXCEPT
(A) data from the University of Chicago
(B) a recent history of the meat-packing industry
(C) social workers
(D) historical sources for the late nineteenth century
(E) government records
Answer: B
Explanation: The passage's author is unmistakably discussing the unfavourable circumstances in the meat-packing sector. The author of the recent history, however, is referring to favourable circumstances in the meat-packing sector. As a result, it is clear that (B) a recent history of the meat-packing industry is not reflecting unfavourable circumstances in the sector.
- The author of the passage mentions the "social movement" generated by Chicago's South Side community primarily in order to
(A) inform the reader of events that occurred in the meat-packing industry after the period of time covered by the history
(B) suggest the history’s limitations by pointing out a situation that the history failed to explain adequately
(C) salvage the history's point of view by suggesting that there were positive developments in the meat-packing industry due to worker unity
(D) introduce a new issue designed to elaborate on the good relationship between the meat-packers and Chicago's ethnic communities
(E) suggest that the history should have focused more on the general issue of the relationship between labour movements and healthy industrial communities
Answer: B
Explanation: The author has mentioned about the social movement solely to provide an example that history is not always correct. The social movement of Chicago’s south side community is not clearly explained in history. Hence sets a perfect example to point out the situation about limitations of history.This statement is mentioned in option B.
- According to the passage, the working conditions of skilled workers in the meatpacking industry during the 1880's were influenced by
(A) the workers' determined complaints about the rate and conditions of their work
(B) the efforts of social workers to improve sanitation in the packinghouses
(C) the workers' ability to perform the industry's complex tasks
(D) improvements in the industry's packing process that occurred in the 1880’s
(E) opportunities for job advancement due to the filling of less desirable positions by increasing numbers of unskilled workers
Answer: C
Explanation: In the lines “ .. the wages and conditions…latter were wretched” It is clearly mentioned that the workers. Who were highly skilled were strategically important to the firm. Therefore they were kept in good condition. It was only a requirement for people to do complex tasks that made all the difference. C is the correct choice.
- The author of the passage uses the second paragraph to
(A) summarise the main point of the history discussed in the passage
(B) explain why the history discussed in the passage has been disparaged by critics
(C) evaluate the findings of recent studies that undermine the premise of the history discussed in the passage
(D) introduce a hypothesis that will be discussed in detail later in the passage
(E) present evidence that is intended to refute the argument of the history discussed in the passage
Answer: E
Explanation: The passage's author asserts that there is an issue with the most recent work. The author also makes the case that things were not going well. As a result, we can infer that the passage's author and the author of the more recent work are in conflict. Therefore, choice E is the best one.
- The tone of the author of the passage in discussing the meat-packer community on Chicago's South Side can best be described as one of
(A) appreciation of the community's ability to cope with difficult conditions
(B) admiration for the community's refusal to cooperate with labour agitators
(C) indignation at the kind of social conditions the community faced
(D) annoyance at the community's inability to abolish discrimination in the meat-packing industry
(E) concern that the meat-packers' feelings for their community have not been documented
Answer: A
Explanation: In the lines, “The pride … provided its livelihood”. This community's success implies appreciation of the community's ability. Effectively, "confronted" denotes the capacity to deal with, "the issues of" the difficulty, and "livelihood" in this context denotes the circumstances. A is the best option.
- The information in the passage suggests that the author of the history discussed in the passage made which of the following errors?
(A) Failing to recognize the effect of the diversity of the South Side community on the meat-packers' efforts to reform the industry
(B) Attributing good working conditions in the meat-packing industry to the efforts of labour agitators
(C) Overemphasise the importance of the availability of unskilled labour as an influence on conditions in the meatpacking industry
(D) Interpreting the meat-packers' feelings for their community as appreciation of their industry
(E) Failing to observe the pride and commitment felt by the meat-packers
Answer: D
Explanation: "X is less Y" denotes that "X is not Y." Product has synonyms like outcome, result, and consequence. Vibrance and viability are indicators of good, positive things. Worker vs. corporate conflict is formed in this section. Therefore, in this sentence, community refers to labourers, and industry in Chicago refers to the meatpacking business. Indeed sends the message that it will speak in the same context as what was just expressed. We can clearly see that these two sentences discuss what the author of recent history overlooked: namely, that it was the labourers' efforts, not the businesses', that improved working conditions.
Suggested GMAT Reading Comprehension Questions
- Firms traditionally claim that they downsize GMAT Reading Comprehension
- In 1675, Louis XIV established the Parisian seamstresses’ guild, GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Whereas United States economic productivity grew at an annual rate of 3 percent GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Because the framers of the United States Constitution (written in 1787) GMAT Reading Comprehension
- In the Sonoran Desert of Northwestern Mexico and Southern Arizona GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Many People Believe that Because Wages are Lower in Developing Countries GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Seventeenth Century Philosopher John Locke Stated that as much as 99 percent GMAT Reading Comprehension
- When Asteroids Collide, Some Collisions cause an Asteroid to Spin Faster GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Most Attempts by Physicists to Send Particles Faster than the Speed GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Scientists have been Puzzled by the Seeming Disparity GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Carotenoids, A Family of Natural Pigments, Form an Important Part of the Colorful Signals GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Conodonts, The Spiky Phosphatic Remains GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Determining Whether a Given Population of Animals Constitutes a Distinct Species GMAT Reading Comprehension
- In 1994, A Team of Scientists Led by David McKay Began Studying the Meteorite GMAT Reading Comprehension
- There is No Consensus Among Researchers GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Resin is a Plant Secretion that Hardens when Exposed to Air GMAT Reading Comprehension
- During the past 40 years, the star FG Sagittae has changed color from blue to yellow GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Linda Kerber argued in the mid-1980’s that after the American Revolution (1775-1783) GMAT Reading Comprehension
- When Jamaican-born social activist Marcus Garvey came to the United States in 1916 GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Historians Sometimes Forget that History is Continually Being Made GMAT Reading Comprehension
Comments