A New Medication for Migraine Seems Effective, But There is Concern GMAT Critical Reasoning

Rituparna Nath logo

byRituparna Nath Content Writer at Study Abroad Exams

Question - A new medication for migraine seems effective, but there is concern that the medication might exacerbate heart disease. If patients with heart disease take the medication under careful medical supervision, however, harmful side effects can definitely be averted. The concern about those side effects is thus unfounded.

The argument depends on which one of the following assumptions?

(A) The new medication actually is effective when taken by patients with heart disease.
(B) No migraine sufferers with heart disease will take the new medication except under careful medical supervision.
(C) Most migraine sufferers who have taken the new medication in trials also had heart disease.
(D) The new medication has various other side effects, but none as serious as that of exacerbating heart disease.
(E) The new medication will displace all migraine medications currently being used.

‘A new medication for migraine seems effective, but there is concern’ is the topic for GMAT critical reasoning. This section analyses the candidates' command of language and analytical skills to express.
The main focus of GMAT critical reasoning questions is examining how well a candidate can analyze the argument, find its flaws, and develop a plan of action. GMAT Critical Reasoning comes with five options and candidates need to choose the one which is correct. It comes with less than 100 words of the passage. There will be questions related to the passage, the candidates have to look for the answers that make their argument appear stronger by weakening the passage.

Answer: B

Explanation: The critical reasoning section of the GMAT tests how logical and analytical a candidate is. The applicant must use reasoning and deduction skills to come up with a response that makes sense.

Hypothesis 1: new medication for migraine found effective but might exacerbate heart disease
Hypothesis 2 : medication under medical supervision can avert harmful side effect.

Conclusion: concern about side effect is unfounded.
It can be assumed that heart patient will take new migraine medication under some medical supervision.

The argument depends on one of the following assumptions:

Option (A) The new medication actually is effective when taken by patients with heart disease.
-This assumption does not satisfy the question. In fact, denies the premise given in the passage. So option A is not appropriate.

Option (B) No migraine sufferers with heart disease will take the new medication except under careful medical supervision.
-This statement states that if every sufferer of heart disease takes under medical supervision, no concern will be there. So option B is appropriate.

Option (C) Most migraine sufferers who have taken the new medication in trials also had heart disease.
-This assumption does not satisfy the question.

Option (D) The new medication has various other side effects, but none as serious as that of exacerbating heart disease.
-This assumption does not satisfy the question.

Option (E) The new medication will displace all migraine medications currently being used.
-This assumption does not satisfy the question. They still don't inform us how medical supervision can avert side effects.

Suggested GMAT Critical Reasoning Questions

Fees Structure

CategoryState
General15556

In case of any inaccuracy, Notify Us! 

Comments


No Comments To Show