
bySayantani Barman Experta en el extranjero
Reading Passage Question:
A conventional view of nineteenth-century Britain holds that iron manufacturers and textile manufacturers from the north of England became the wealthiest and most powerful people in society after about 1832. According to Marxist historians, these industrialists were the target of the working class in its struggle for power. A new study by Rubinstein, however, suggests that the real wealth lay with the bankers and merchants of London. Rubinstein does not deny that a northern industrial elite existed but argues that it was consistently outnumbered and outdone by a London-based commercial elite. His claims are provocative and deserve consideration.
Rubinstein’s claim about the location of wealth comes from his investigation of probate records. These indicate the value of personal property, excluding real property (buildings and land), left by individuals at death. It does seem as if large fortunes were more frequently made in commerce than in industry and, within industry, more frequently from alcohol or tobacco than from textiles or metal. However, such records do not unequivocally make Rubinstein’s case. Uncertainties abound about how the probate rules for valuing assets were actually applied. Mills and factories, being real property, were clearly excluded: machinery may also have been, for the same reason. What the valuation conventions were for stock-in-trade (goods for sale) is also uncertain. It is possible that their probate values were much lower than their actual market value: cash or near-cash, such as bank balances or stocks, were, on the other hand, invariably considered at full face value. A further complication is that probate valuations probably took no notice of a business’s goodwill (favor with the public) which, since it represents expectations about future profit-making, would today very often be a large fraction of market value. Whether factors like these introduced systematic biases into the probate valuations of individuals with different types of businesses would be worth investigating.
The orthodox view that the wealthiest individuals were the most powerful is also questioned by Rubinstein’s study. The problem for this orthodox view is that Rubinstein finds many millionaires who are totally unknown to nineteenth-century historians: the reason for their obscurity could be that they were not powerful. Indeed, Rubinstein dismisses any notion that great wealth had anything to do with entry into the governing elite, as represented by bishops, higher civil servants, and chairmen of manufacturing companies. The only requirements were university attendance and a father with a middle-class income.
Rubinstein, in another study, has begun to buttress his findings about the location of wealth by analyzing income tax returns, which reveal a geographical distribution of middle-class incomes similar to that of wealthy incomes revealed by probate records. But until further confirmatory investigation is done, his claims can only be considered partially convincing.
‘A conventional view of nineteenth-century Britain holds that iron GMAT Reading Comprehension’’ is a GMAT reading comprehension passage with answers. Candidates need a strong knowledge of English GMAT reading comprehension.
This GMAT Reading Comprehension consists of 7 comprehension questions.
The GMAT Reading Comprehension questions are designed for the purpose of testing candidates’ abilities in understanding, analysing, and applying information or concepts. Candidates can actively prepare with the help of GMAT Reading Comprehension Practice Questions.
Questions and Solutions
- The main idea of the passage is that
(A) the Marxist interpretation of the relationship between class and power in nineteenth-century Britain is no longer viable
(B) a simple equation between wealth and power is unlikely to be supported by new data from nineteenth-century British archives
(C) a recent historical investigation has challenged but not disproved the orthodox view of the distribution of wealth and the relationship of wealth to power in nineteenth-century Britain
(D) probate records provide the historian with a revealing but incomplete glimpse of the extent and location of wealth in nineteenth-century Britain
(E) An attempt has been made to confirm the findings of a new historical study of nineteenth-century Britain, but complete confirmation is likely to remain elusive
Answer: C
Explanation: A brief citation of Marxist historians appears in P1. A is therefore erroneous. B is not relevant. Consequently, it is untrue. Rubenstein's work, which has challenged but not refuted the conventional wisdom regarding the distribution of wealth and the connection between wealth and power in nineteenth-century Britain, is new. Therefore, C is the best option.
- The author of the passage implies that probate records as a source of information about wealth in nineteenth-century Britain are
(A) self-contradictory and misleading
(B) ambiguous and outdated
(C) controversial but readily available
(D) revealing but difficult to interpret
(E) widely used by historians but fully understandable only by specialists
Answer: D
Explanation: To find the answer to this query, particularly, consult P2 "But these records don't... Assets were in fact used." The reason why the author thinks the probate records aren't full is covered in some detail. Any response option that follows this logic will be the one we should have chosen. The right answer in this case is D.
- The author suggests that the total probate valuations of the personal property of individuals holding goods for sale in nineteenth-century Britain may have been
(A) affected by the valuation conventions for such goods
(B) less accurate than the valuations for such goods provided by income tax returns
(C) less, on average, if such goods were tobacco-related than if they were alcohol-related
(D) greater, on average, than the total probate valuations of those individuals who held bank balances
(E) dependent on whether such goods were held by industrialists or by merchants or bankers
Answer: A
Explanation: We can observe how this decision follows the same logic as the passage's section discussed in pre-thinking. A is therefore correct. B cannot be concluded from the passage's information. Additionally, P4 brings up tax returns in another context. None of the other choices may be assumed.
- According to the passage, Rubinstein has provided evidence that challenges which one of the following claims about nineteenth-century Britain?
(A) The distribution of great wealth between commerce and industry was not equal.
(B) Large incomes were typically made in alcohol and tobacco rather than textiles and metals.
(C) A London-based commercial elite can be identified.
(D) An official governing elite can be identified.
(E) There was a necessary relationship between great wealth and power.
Answer: E
Explanation: Option A is not answered. Hence incorrect. Option B is also not answered. Options C and D are also out of the scope of the passage. In the passage, it is given that, the orthodox view that the wealthiest individuals are the most powerful is also questioned by Rubinstein’s study. E is the correct answer.
- The author mentions that goodwill was probably excluded from the probate valuation of a business in nineteenth-century Britain most likely in order to
(A) give an example of a business asset about which little was known in the nineteenth century
(B) suggest that the probate valuations of certain businesses may have been significant underestimations of their true market value
(C) make the point that this exclusion probably had an equal impact on the probate valuations of all nineteenth-century British businesses
(D) indicate that expectations about future profit-making is the single most important factor in determining the market value of certain businesses
(E) argue that the twentieth-century method of determining probate valuations of a business may be consistently superior to the nineteenth-century method
Answer: B
Explanation: According to the text, a further issue is that probate assessments likely did not consider a company's goodwill (public favour), which today is frequently a significant portion of market value because it implies expectations about future profit-making. As a result, choice B is the right response.
- Which one of the following studies would provide support for Rubinstein’s claims?
(A) a study that indicated that many members of the commercial elite in nineteenth-century London had insignificant holdings of real property
(B) a study that indicated that in the nineteenth century, industrialists from the north of England were in fact a target for working-class people
(C) a study that indicated that, in nineteenth-century Britain, probate values of goods for sale were not as high as probate values of cash assets
(D) a study that indicated that the wealth of nineteenth-century British industrialists did not appear to be significantly greater when the full value of their real property holdings was actually considered
(E) a study that indicated that at least some members of the official governing elite in nineteenth-century Britain owned more real property than had previously been thought to be the case
Answer: D
Explanation: Rubenstein came to the generalisation that "probate records are a valid approach to assess wealth." This conclusion, however, should be supported by a crucial supposition that contradicts what the author says in the second paragraph.
Hypothesis: "Probate documents show.......was owned by someone"
D is the right answer, thus.
- Which one of the following, if true, would cast the most doubt on Rubinstein’s argument concerning wealth and the official governing elite in nineteenth-century Britain?
(A) Entry into this elite was more dependent on university attendance than on religious background.
(B) Attendance at a prestigious university was probably more crucial than a certain minimum family income in gaining entry into this elite.
(C) Bishops as a group were somewhat wealthier, at the point of entry into this elite, than were higher civil servants or chairmen of manufacturing companies.
(D) The families of many members of this elite owned few, if any, shares in iron industries and textile industries in the north of England.
(E) The composition of this elite included vice-chancellors, many of whom held office because of their wealth.
Answer: E
Explanation: The discussion of this elite comes in the second-to-last paragraph.
Rubenstein claimed that members of this elite were not required to be wealthy. Therefore, any claim that suggests that money is necessary will be undermined.
The requirement for an elite level job is wealth, according to answer E. hence true.
Suggested GMAT Reading Comprehension Questions
- Many People Believe that Wages are Lower in Developing Countries GMAT Reading Comprehension
- More Selective than Most Chemical Pesticides in that they Ordinarily Destroy GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Ethnohistoric Documents from Sixteenth-Century Mexico Suggesting that Weaving GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Solar Ponds are Bodies of Water in Which Circulation is Incomplete GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Citing the Fact that the Real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Historians have Identified Two Dominant Currents in the Russian Women GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Some Historians Contend that Conditions in the United States GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Comparable Worth, as a Standard Applied to Eliminate Inequities in Pay GMAT Reading Comprehension
- The United States Government has a Long-Standing Policy GMAT Reading Comprehension
- A Recent Study has Provided Clues to Predator-Prey Dynamics GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Even More Than Mountainside Slides of Mud or Snow GMAT Reading Comprehension
- The Black Death, a Severe Epidemic that Ravaged Fourteenth Century Europe GMAT Reading Comprehension
- The System of Patent-Granting, Which Confers Temporary GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Although the Industrial Union Organizations that Emerged Under the Banner GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Traditional Social Science Models of Class Groups in the United States GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Conventional Wisdom has it that Large Deficits in the United States GMAT Reading Comprehension
- A One-Child Policy was Implemented in China in 1979 GMAT Reading Comprehension
- The Pioneers of the Teaching of Science Imagined that its Introduction GMAT Reading Comprehension
- A Fundamental Principle of Pharmacology is that all Drugs GMAT Reading Comprehension
- In the 1980's, Astronomer Bohdan Paczynski Proposed a Way of Determining GMAT Reading Comprehension
Comments